Explaining how to replace object and subject in photography from Baudrillard's point of view (Case Study: Jean Baudrillard’s photo collection; “Ultimate paradox”)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 PhD student in Philosophy of Art.Faculty of Art, central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad Univercity, Tehran, Iran.

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Philosophy of Art , Hamedan Branch , Islamic azad University , Hamedan , Iran.

3 Professor, Department of Textile and Clothing Design, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Yazd Branch, Islamic Azad University, Yazd, Iran

10.30480/vaa.2023.4908.1853

Abstract

Baudrillard believes that photography has many amazements as the world can fully vanish in a photo. Hence, an image does not reveal reality to us, rather depicts the absence of the world. Likewise, due to this absence and lack of objectivity in photography, one could witness the mutual relationship between the object and the subject and hence acknowledge the astonishing impact of the image.
Baudrillard’s main problem is the reality in today’s world, a reality that is no longer original and real, since hyperreality has now dominated human life.
From his perspective, the image goes from the stage of a reflecting reality to a stage of concealing reality, and then to the stage of concealing the absence of reality, and in the third stage, has no relationships with reality. In the fourth stage, it reaches the integral reality, a sort of ultra reality that terminates all reality, as well as illusion. Baudrillard’s philosophical views have been shown in his artworks, and his photos have a direct relationship with his philosophy. Baudrillard does not seek the truth that is hidden in the image, rather seeks to introduce the hierarchies that guide our perception of the images of the surrounding world, and his writings are meant to elucidate the unreality around us, which is indeed mistakenly considered to be real. We have the tendency to assume that the subject, referring to the photographer, by choosing the object/issue and photographing him, decides what will appear in the form of the object in the photograph, however, Baudrillard reverses this relationship and describes that it is actually the object that discovers the subject by imposing its presence on the subject, and according to Baudrillard’s view, the photographic object has a desire to become an image and at the moment of choosing the frame and the subject, the photographic object passes this desire to the photographer so that he could replicate this desire in his photography. Therefore, in this research along with a discovery on his philosophy and explaining the ultra reality from his viewpoint, a number of his photo collection “Ultimate paradox”,have been exhibited and presented in the 80s and 90s. The main objective and goal of this research is the analysis and examination of ultra reality photography from Baudrillard’s perspectives. In order to do so, in parallel to a wider recognition of his viewpoints, in regard to photography as art, we aim to raise the question as to how reality can disappear and become invisible in photos. The methodology in practice is a descriptive analytic one, which uses literature of Baudrillard’s viewpoints as the main source of research. By doing so, one arrives at such a conclusion that photography can achieve extraordinary qualities once freed from the known aesthetic factor, opening a new perspective to the observer. Simultaneously, analyzing the formation of the bilateral relationship between the object and the subject in photography.

Keywords

Main Subjects


- Baudrillard,Jean. )1987(, “Please Follow Me” in Art & Text 23/4, March-April 1987:108.
- --------------------. )1994(, “Simulacra and Simulation”, Michigan, MI: University of
Michigan Press.
- 1997(.-------------------a(, “Objects, Images, and the Possibilities of Aesthetic Illusion”.
In Art and Artifact. Nicholas Zurbrugg )Editor(. London: Sage Publications, 1997:12.
- 1997( .---------------b(, Fragments: Cool Memories III, 1991-95 Paperback – November
17, 1997.
- --------------------. )1997c(, “The Art of Disappearance”, in Nicholas Zurbrugg)ed( Jean
Baudrillard: Art and artifact, London, Thousand Oaks, CA, New Delhi: Sage publications.
- 1999( .------------------(, Photographies 1985 – 1998. Peter Weibel )Ed.(, Hatje-Cantz
and Neue Gallery, Graz.
- ---------------------. )2001(, Impossible Exchange, December 17, 2001 by Verso.
- --------------------. )2005(, the Intelligence of Evil or the Lucidity Pact, oxford and New
York: Berg.
- --------------------. )2006( ‘The writing of the shadows’, C International Photo Magazine,
Number 2, pp. 14–16
- Butler, Rex. )2005(, “Baudrillard’s Light Writing Or Photographic Thought”, Victoria Grace,
Heather Worth and Laurence Simmons. Baudrillard: West of the Dateline. Palmerston North,
New Zealand: Dunmore Press, 2003:245-258.
- G.Smith, Richard. )2018(, “Baudrillard’s Photographic Theory”, Museum of Contemporary Art
of Rome )MACRO(, November 21st
- Searle A. )1998( ‘Pictures of hyperreality’, The Guardian, February 13th, 26–27
- Scheer, Edward. )2006(, “The most delicate of operations”: Baudrillard’s Photographic
Abreactions, Volume 3, Number 1 )January 2006( .
- Zurbrugg, 1997Nicholas. )1997(, “Jean Baudrillard: Art and artifact”, London, Thousand Oaks,
CA, New Delhi: Sage publications