Document Type : Original Article
Authors
Abstract
In the course of the interrogation of reading, understanding and deconstruction in the postmodern era, the critique of the position of criticism in the achievements of postmodern discourse has a cross-border approach to each other's borders. A negation that addresses invertebrate invertebilities and the method of deconstruction that reproduces the work of art, as well as the deconstructionist approach Derrida proposes, are infinitely multidimensional and semantic in paradoxical contradictions. Accordingly, the question of how the rebellious reproduction of the work of art in the postmodern age corresponds to the concepts of deconstruction and deconstruction, seems to be the reproduction of the monolithic overlapping overlapping of the critical boundaries in the approach of negation and deconstruction and deconstruction To show. On this basis, the present study aimed at studying the dominant discourse in the postmodern period, by analytical method (based on the analysis of dialogue, eclecticism, communicative space, interpersonalism, and descriptiveness), to study the controversial reproduction of the monolithic sign in the postmodern deconstructionist approach Pays The result of the rebellious reproduction of the Monaliza is to visualize the opposites in a paradoxical way, and by destroying texts and opposing meanings to discourses such as this and that, conversation and polygonum in a chain of signs Which produces meaning, because the negation is a critical method, which, by incorporating the works and previous texts, establishes the conversation of being founded on the contradictions that are simultaneously expressed in the attitude of breaking the foundation, Lays down Hence, practices, defamation, deconstruction, and the breakdown of shared deconstructions in contemporary discourse, which oppose dialogism.In the course of the interrogation of reading, understanding and deconstruction in the postmodern era, the critique of the position of criticism in the achievements of postmodern discourse has a cross-border approach to each other's borders. A negation that addresses invertebrate invertebilities and the method of deconstruction that reproduces the work of art, as well as the deconstructionist approach Derrida proposes, are infinitely multidimensional and semantic in paradoxical contradictions. Accordingly, the question of how the rebellious reproduction of the work of art in the postmodern age corresponds to the concepts of deconstruction and deconstruction, seems to be the reproduction of the monolithic overlapping overlapping of the critical boundaries in the approach of negation and deconstruction and deconstruction To show. On this basis, the present study aimed at studying the dominant discourse in the postmodern period, by analytical method (based on the analysis of dialogue, eclecticism, communicative space, interpersonalism, and descriptiveness), to study the controversial reproduction of the monolithic sign in the postmodern deconstructionist approach Pays The result of the rebellious reproduction of the Monaliza is to visualize the opposites in a paradoxical way, and by destroying texts and opposing meanings to discourses such as this and that, conversation and polygonum in a chain of signs Which produces meaning, because the negation is a critical method, which, by incorporating the works and previous texts, establishes the conversation of being founded on the contradictions that are simultaneously expressed.
Keywords
)