Document Type : Original Article
Authors
- Mina Mouhebati 1
- Maryam Llari 2
- Bahman Namvar Motlagh 3
- Abolfazl Davodi Roknabadi 4
- Soodabeh Salehi 5
1 PhD. student, Department of Art Research, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Art, Islamshahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Islamshahr, Iran
3 Associate Professor, Faculty of Literature and Human Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
4 Associate Professor, Faculty of Arts and Architecture, Yazd Branch, Islamic Azad University, Yazd, Iran
5 Associate Professor, Department of Graphic, School of Visual Arts, the University of Arts, Tehran. Iran
Abstract
The continuity of the two fields of reading and the creation of works of art always indicates that the promotion of each of them leads to the qualitative growth of the other field. The process of creating and evolving various artistic branches shows that proper reading and how to create works of art can promote future artistic creations. Assuming that genetic criticism seems to have the capabilities and components that can be effective in reading graphic design works, and as a result, a step is taken towards the qualitative growth of these works and consequently the visual culture of Iranian society, this query deals with this research and in its path, it will seek to find the answer to the main question: "Which capabilities and characteristics of the genetic criticism approach can act as an effective and key tool for reading and critique of Iranian graphic design artworks?" And two sub-questions: "What are the goals and usage of the genetic criticism process?" And "How is the process of creating graphic design and addressing the issue of graphic design works?" In the course of this research, they will be examined and answered.The present study is practical in terms of purpose and descriptive-analytical in terms of method. In the process of research, literature and theoretical foundations of the field of critical criticism on the one hand and the fields of graphic design, design thinking and consequently visual thinking on the other hand, through the study of written documents and sources, has been studied and the required data have been collected. In order to answer the research questions through a qualitative approach, the collected data in the field of developmental reading and graphic design were first analyzed and then evaluated. In this regard, a work from the branch of cultural graphics by Majid Abbasi, a contemporary Iranian graphic designer, selected as a study example, and reviewed in a developmental manner. The desired artwork is the cover of the novel "The Bread of Those Early Years" written by Henriche Bell, which was published in 2001 by Cheshmeh Publishing. Findings show that comparing the trend and matching the volume and type of documents and evidence that the graphic designer leaves in all stages of creating an artwork, as well as other factors affecting the process of producing and creating a graphic artwork, shows that the ability to form a rich developmental file for graphic artwork includes pretext, meta text, para text, and hyper text documents.
As a result, the capabilities and functions of genetic criticism, such as focusing on the process and providing a better understanding of the text, the recognition author, his or her creativity and artistic imagination, performance methods and styles, are consistent with the path taken in graphic design and extracted results from the genetic approach can lead to qualitative growth of various aspects of future graphic design works.
Keywords
احمدی، بابک. )1375 .)ساختار و تأویل متن. ج1 .تهران: مرکز.
اسداللهی، شکراهلل. )۱۳۸6« .)روش نقد تکوینی در ادبیات. فرهنگستان هنر. )شماره 7 ،)92-62.
افشــارمهاجر، کامــران. )۱۳۸۸« .)تفکرــ بص ری در کتابه ای درس ی دانش گاهی«. نامــه هنرهــای
تجســمی و کاربــردی. )شــماره 3 ،)75-۸۶.
آیتاللهی، حبیباهلل. )1384 .)شیوۀ مختلف نقد هنر. تهران: سوره مهر.
ایو تادیه، ژان. )1378 .)نقد ادبی در قرن بیستم. ترجمه مهشید نونهالی. تهران: نیلوفر.
باغبانماهــر، ســجاد. )۱۳۸۶« .)نقــد تکوینــی اثــری از نگارگــری معاصــر ایــران«. فرهنگســتان هنــر.
.136-۱۵۱ ،)۷شــماره)
بیدختــی، محمدعلــی. )۱۳۸9« .)نقــد تکوینــی در شــناخت و تحلیــل عکاســی ایــران«. پایاننامــه دکتــری.
تهـران: دانشـگاه تربیـت مـدرس.
شـریفیمهرجردی، علیاکبـر، و حسـنعلی برومنـد. )۱۳۹۱« .)رویکـرد بـه نقاشـی دیـواری مسـجد جامـع
خرمشـهر بـه شـیوۀ تکوینـی«. نامـه هنرهـای تجسـمی و کاربـردی. )شـماره ۹ ،)۵۲-۳۷.
عباسی، مجید. )۱۳۸۴ .)راهیان و راویان. تهران: دید.
فورست، لیلیان. )1387 .)رمانتیسم. ترجمه مسعود جعفری. تهران: مرکز.
کارول، نوئل. )1393 .)درباره نقد. ترجمه صالح طباطبایی. تهران: نشر نی.
کنگرانی، منیژه. )۱۳۸۶« .)نقد تکوینی گرنیکا«. فرهنگستان هنر. )شماره ۷ ،)۱35-115.
الپتــن، الــن. )۱۳۹۴ .)تفکــر طراحــی گرافیــک: آنســوی طوفــان مغــزی. ترجمــه نازیــا محمدقلــیزاده.
تهــران: فرهنگســرای میردشــتی.
الزیــو، پــل. )۱۳۹۶ .)تفکــر ترســیمی بــرای معمــاران و طراحــان. ترجمــه ســعید آقایــی. تهــران: پرهــام
نقـش.
الوسـون، برایـان. )۱۳۹۵ .)طراحـان چگونـه میاندیشـند: ابهامزدایـی از فرآینـد طراحـی. ترجمـه حمیـد
ندیمـی. تهـران: دانشـگاه شـهید بهشـتی.
مکاریــک، ایدناریمــا. )۱۳۹۳ .)دانشنامــۀ نظریههــای ادبــی معاصــر. ترجمــه مهــران مهاجــر و محمــد
نبــوی. تهــران: آگــه.
مگـز، فیلیـپ. )۱۳۸۶ .)تاریـخ طراحـی گرافیـک. ترجمـه ناهیـد اعظـم فراسـت و غالمحسـین فتـحاهلل نـوری.
تهران: ســمت.
نامورمطلـق، بهمـن، و شـکراهلل اسـداللهی تجـرق. )۱۳۸۸ .)نقـد تکوینـی در هنـر و ادبیـات. تهـران: علمـی
فرهنگـی.
نامورمطلـق، بهمـن. )۱۳۸۶« .)ترامتنیـت مطالعـه روابـط یـک متـن بـا دیگـر متنهـا«. پژوهشنامـه علـوم
انسـانی دانشـگاه شـهید بهشـتی. )شـماره ۵۶ ،)۹۸-83.
نبــت، آ، و ر. اگلــش. )۱۳۸۶« .)زیباییشناســی پویــا و تعاملــی: تســهیل مشــارکت احساســی عاطفــی
مخاطـب در فرآینـد طراحـی خالقـه«. ترجمـه روبـرت صافاریـان. حرفـه هنرمنـد. )شـماره ۱۹ ،)۳۳-30.
نخجیـری، هـدی. )1394« .)نقـد تکوینـی نقاشـی معاصـر ایرانـی: مـورد مطالعاتـی اثـر گالیـه از رضـا
ورامینی، نیما. )1392 .)تفکر خالق در گرافیک. تهران: هنر نو.
Arnheim, Rudolf. (1969). Visual Thinking. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Biasi, Pierre-Marc de. (2000). La génétique des textes. Paris: Nathan.
Brown, Tim (2008). “Design Thinking, Harvard Business Review”, www.hbr.org, June, 84-92.
Buzan, Tony. (1996). How to Use Radiant Thinking to Maximize Your Brain Uptopped Potential.
New York: Plume.
Cross, Nigel. (2007). “Forty Years of Design Research”. Design Studies. (vol 28), 1-4.
Dan, Roam. (2008). The Back of the Napkin. USA: Penguin Group.
Deppman, Jed, and et al.(2004). Genetic Criticism: Texts and Avant-Textes, Philadelphia:
University of Pensilvania Press. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Owen, C. (2007). “Design Thinking: Notes on Its Nature and Use”. Design Research Quarterly.
(vol 1), 16-27.
https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/news-opinion/what-framework-innovation-design-councils-
evolved-double-diamond