نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکترا، رشته طراحی صنعتی، دانشکده هنرهای زیبا، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.
2 استادیار، گروه طراحی صنعتی، دانشکده هنرهای زیبا، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
3 استادیار، گروه طراحی صنعتی، دانشکده هنر، دانشگاه سمنان، سمنان، ایران.
چکیده
شهود یک توانایی ذهنی بر اساس نظام دانش ناخودآگاه است که نقش اساسی را در فرایند های خلاقه بازی میکند و در کنار استدلال خودآگاه، بنیان فکری انسان را تشکیل میدهند. طرّاحی به عنوان یک فعّالیت پیچیده شناختی نیازمند استفاده مناسب از هر دو توانمندی است اما متاسفانه در جامعه دانشگاهی، تاکید صرف بر روی توانایی های استدلالی برای حل مسائل طراحی باعث شده است که طراحان شناخت مطلوبی از شهود نداشته باشند. هدف پژوهش حاضر، شناسایی عوامل موثّر بر شهود در حوزه طراحی است و سعی شده است مهمترین عواملی که بر شهود طراحان در ایده پردازی و حل مسئله موثر هستند شناسایی شده و معرفی گردند تا به عنوان بنیانی برای توسعه روش های توانمندسازی تفکّر شهودی در فرایند طرّاحی استفاده گردند. اطّلاعات مورد نیاز به دو روش مطالعات کتابخانه ای و میدانی و با کاربرد ابزارهای اصلی مصاحبه و پرسشنامه جمع آوری شده و داده های آماری به شیوه توصیفی و استنباطی مورد تجزیه و تحلیل قرار گرفته است. نتایج پژوهش شامل معرفی عوامل موثّر بر شهود طراحان در فرایند طراحی است که میتوانند برای توسعه روش ها و ابزارهایی در جهت تقویت تفکّر شهودی و زمینه سازی بروز رخدادهای شهودی در طرّاحی مورد استفاده قرار گیرند.
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
Investigating the factors affecting the intuitive thinking of designers in the design process
نویسندگان [English]
- Kaveh Tebyani 1
- Alireza Ajdari 2
- Ebrahim Bagheri Taleghani 3
1 Ph.D. Student of Industrial Design, Faculty of Fine Arts, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Assistant Professor, Industrial Design Department, Faculty of Fine Arts, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran.
3 Assistant Professor, Industrial Design Department, Faculty of Arts, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran.
چکیده [English]
Intuition is a mental ability based on unconscious knowledge structures which plays a key role in creative processes and intertwined with conscious reasoning, they form the foundation of human thinking. Design, as a complex cognitive process, requires proper use of both of these mental abilities; but unfortunately due to the mere emphasis on using reasoning abilities for solving design problems in academic society, designers do not have appropriate knowledge about intuition. Intuition, as one of the fundamental cognitive capacities, has been less systematically studied as a reliable means for problem-solving processes, which emphasizes the importance of the present study. The advantage of intuitive thinking over logical thinking is its ability to solve complex problems in difficult situations, and since "design" is now considered as a way of problem solving ability, intuitive thinking will have a valuable capacity to play a role in this activity.
The main objective of this research is to identify and introduce the factors which influence intuition as a valuable mental ability in the field of design. In other words, the factors that affect intuition of designers in ideation and problem solving during design processes have been identified and introduced to be used as a basis for developing methods to empower intuitive thinking in the design process. The statistical population consists of 60 industrial designers in Tehran, who were randomly selected. The criterion for selecting the sample is having a university degree in industrial design, general familiarity with design methodology and activity in one of the specialized fields as an industrial designer. Among the target population, 75 designers were identified with the mentioned specifications and 60 of them were selected as a statistical sample using Cochran's formula. In order to identify the factors affecting intuition, a questionnaire consisting of 3 descriptive questions and 27 multiple choice questions was used. The validity and reliability of this questionnaire were evaluated and confirmed according to the content analysis method and Cronbach's alpha test, respectively (Cronbach's alpha = 0.72). The method of data analysis in this study is descriptive and inferential and frequency distribution tables and chi-square have been used. Statistical analyzes were performed using SPSS software version 22.
The study of the factors which affect intuition of designers in the design process confirms the possibility of strengthening intuitive thinking and consciously paving the way for the occurrence of intuitive events. The results of the research include the introduction of eleven factors which affect intuition of designers in design process in four categories: Circumstance and context, Individual characteristics, knowing and mental processing and synthesis. In the continuation of the research, 11 identified factors affecting intuition, after being introduced to designers, were approved and emphasized, and based on their experiences regarding intuitive events and solving design problems with the help of intuition, 21 related and effective sub-variables affecting intuition of designers identified. These variables can be used for creation and development of methods and tools to empower intuitive thinking and providing conditions for occurrence of intuitive perceptions in design.
کلیدواژهها [English]
- Intuition
- Unconscious knowledge system
- Problem solving
- Creativity
- Design process
- شرفی، زهرا. )1392 .)پژوهشی در باب پدیده شهود در هنر. پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد. گروه پژوهش هنر.
پردیس هنرهای زیبا. دانشگاه تهران
Stoneman. thinking creative on impact its and construct the Evaluating: Intuition). 2003. (T, Bastick-
.Lang&
New. expertise of level by intuition of development the for model shaped-U A). 2001. (L. A, Baylor-
.academia.www://https. Thinking Design in Thought Subconscious of Role The). 2015. (C, Burnette-
- 000058)01(X-S0732118/1016.10:DOI. 244–237), 3(19, Psychology in Ideas
Thinking_Design_in_Thought_Subconscious_of_Role_The/17625884/edu
International Conference Design Asian 4th of Bulletin In. Design in Intuition) 1999. (D, Durling-
C3072- 9980776-0-40 ISBN. October, Japan, Nagaoka, 1999 Science Design on Symposium
Oxford: Oxford perspective historical An: mind of duality The). 2009. (K, Frankish. , & J, Evans-
Press University
to submitted dissertation Doctoral. (Thinking Strategic in Role its and Intuition). 2004. (G, Henden-
(Management of School Norwegian BI
.Giroux and Straus, Farrar: York New. slow and fast, Thinking). 2011. (D, Kahneman-
:making decision’ designers affects intuition How). 2014. (G. P, Schaub-Badke. & G. Y, Xiao. T, Ling-
.-22 ,192014, Coroatia – Dubrovnik 2014 design – conference design International. study interview an
an Whether Examining? Carefully Think or Gut Your Trust). 2016,.(J, S, Lerner. C, Kellams-Ma-
Faculty HKS. Accuracy Empathic Greater Produces Thought of Mode, Systematic a Versus, Intuitive
.Series Paper Working Research
Experiences Personal Highly s’Designer): 2009. (L, Rouhiainen., M, Keinanen., A, Raami., S, Mielonen-
,Seoul. Proceedings Electronic Conference IASDR. Intuition Developing for Modeling Intuition of
October- 1822 Korea South
and Generation the in Intuition of Role The) 2016. (J, Bhattacharya. & M, Osman. J, Pétervári-
01420. 2016. fpsyg/3389. 10: doi. 1420: 7. Psychol. Front. Creativity of Stages Evaluation
– intuitiovalmennuksesta Kokemuksia of Summary English): 2011. (S, Mielonen., & A, Raami-
.174–167), 4(31, Aikuiskasvatus. kehittämistä tietoista kohti oppimisesta implisiittisestä Intuition
of Development Intentional towards Learning Implicit From – Coaching Intuition on Experiences(
(Intuition
.Teachers level- University among Thinking Intuitive Developing on Experiences) 2013. (A, Raami-
Experiential on Groups Interest Special s’Society Research Design DRS, Conference 2013 EKSIG(
,UK”. connoisseurship and expertise, knowledge experiential - Out Inside Knowing “Knowledge
(-7.5 .42013 University Loughborough
,series publication University Aalto: Helsinki. UNLEASHED INTUITION). 2015. (A, Raami-
International. thinking innovative for tools Intuitive) 2003. (M, Bernstein-Root. , & R, Bernstein-Root-
- 952-60-6108-9785 ISBN. Architecture and Design, Arts of School, DISSERTATIONS DOCTORAL
Science Elsevier: Boston; Amsterdam). 387–377. pp (Innovation on Handbook
and, synthesis, intuition of roles the: Design Innovation in Creativity). 2017. (Y, Nagai. & T,Taura-
of Context the in Processes Intuitive about Tell Can Neuroscience What). 2007. (D, Cramon. & K, Volz-
- 4 ,131-3148: 5, Innovation and Creativity Design of Journal International. hypothesis
.2077.12.18.2006.jocn-/87 .1162.207710. 18. neuroscience cognitive of Journal. Discovery Perceptual
Psychotherapy of Journal. psychotherapy of case the: process intuitive The). 2005. (H, Welling-
.19), 1(15, Integration
and, theoretical, historical a: intuition of psychology contemporary a Toward). 1968. (R. M, Westcott-
.Winston and Rinehart, Holt. inquiry empirical
/org.wdo://https: at Available. Design Industrial of Definition), 2019 (Organization Design World-
.(2019 November 28 accessed (definition/a