Studying the decorative feature of Persian art from Arthur Pope’s point of view, in relation to the global attitude towards the concept of decorative art

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Associate Prof, Faculty of Cinema and Theater, Tehran University of Art

2 Associate Professor, Faculty of Theories and Art Studies, University of Art

3 Comparative and Analytic History of Islamic Art, Faculty of theories and art studies, University of Art

10.30480/vaa.2021.2964.1466

Abstract

Theoretical foundations of the decorative arts were laid in the nineteenth century and in the ideas of people like Owen Jones . In Jones’ opinion cultural symbols are as general and timeless as natural symbols, and the nature of decorative patterns is language of form and absolute color. The Grammar of Ornament is a summary of his theories. Central to his thesis is the notion that anything that is conceived of as beautiful will be in harmony with the laws of nature .
Arthur Pope’s decorative theory - In the first Pahlavi era - changed the prevailing artistic attitudes of the country, and the new decorative features appeared versus Dar ul- Funun’s representational feature . It seems that Pope’s transhistorical view focusing on some inherent and timeless characteristics of the Persian art, observing a strong identity for it, traced these characteristics back to the ancient history of Persia, and let the officials- protecting the culture and art- , misuse the identity images. On the other hand, the support and application of Pope’s decorative theory by the executive bodies of the government assured a kind of power concentration within the new government in the cultural arena. Hence the decorative theory, aiding the archaic nationalism, was established as the theoretical foundation of Iran’s official art in the first Pahlavi era.
Although in Pope’s decorative theory the beauty of the Iranian art is manifested in the beauty of its pattern and design, Pope believes that terms like "Decorative" and "Ornamental" are not enough to describe the decorative quality of Persian art, and then he introduces “ pure form ” as the main material of the Persian art, and the proper order, accuracy, clarity, elegant designing, and the employment of bold designs as the “decorative ideals of the Persian art”.
this analytical - descriptive research, using Library study methods, aims to study the decorative feature of the Persian art from Pope’s point of view. It is also seeking to answer this fundamental question that: what is the distinction between the definition of the decorative art in the West and the kind of pure formal art representing the decorative quality of Persian art from Pope’s point of view?
It seems that Pope , influenced by the Traditionalists , describes the decorative quality of the Persian art - regarding the ornamental patterns , or considering its techniques or process - a meaningful collection , resulted from the uniqueness of the Persian art, not from some adoptable , general patterns , and meaningless symbols . In this framework, we put the idea of the significant form of the formalists as the equivalent of the decorative ideals of the Persian art, and also focus on formal discourse about the sacred art of the Traditionalists .

Keywords


Ahani, Fatemeh ;Iraj Etessam, Seyed Gholamreza Islami. (2017). The Distinction of Ornament and Decoration in Architecture. Journal of arts & Humanities. Vol. 06,  No .06. Pp 25-34.
Blake ,Shubert Steven.( 1999 ). " The Decorative Arts: A problem in classification ". Journal of the Art Libraries Society of North America. Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 77-81 .   
Brett, David. d'avennes, prisse.(1982). l'art arabe. Paris: Le Sycomore. 1995). “Design Reform and The Laws of Nature”. the massachusetts institute of technology Design Issues. Vol. 11,  No .3, Pp 37-50
Brett, David.(1992). On Decoration. Cambridge: Lutterworth Press.
Crawford, A. (1997). Ideas and Objects: The Arts and Crafts Movement in Britain. Design Issues, 13(1), 15-26.
d'avennes, prisse.(1982). l'art arabe. Paris: Le Sycomore.
Duranty, Edmond (1878).“L’Extrême Orient, Revue d’ensemble des arts asiatiques à l’exposition universelle”. Gazette des Beaux- Arts, 18, 1011-48.
Fry. R. (1920). Vision and Design .London.
Greenhalgh, Paul. (1994). Quotations and Sources on Design and the Decorative Arts . Manchester University Press. Manchester.
Hillenbrand, Robert. (2016). “The Scramble for Persian Art: Pope and His Rivals” in Arthur Upham Pope and A New Survey of Persian Art, Boston: Brill. P.p 15-45. 
Kreigle, Laura. (2007). Grand Designs: Labor, Empire, and the Museum in Victorian Culture. Duke:Duke UP.
Oshinsky, Sara J. “Design Reform.” In Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2000–. http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/dsrf/hd_dsrf.htm (October 2006)
Pater ,Walter.(1900).The Renaissance, Studies in Art and Poetry.  London: Macmillan and Co.
Rizvi, Kishwar.(2007).  “Art History and the Nation: Arthur Upham Pope and the Discourse on “ Parsian Art”  in the Early  Twentieth Century. Muqarnas. Vol:24. Leiden: Boston. Pp.45-64.
Roche, M. (2000). Mega-events & Modernity: Olympics, Expos and the Growth of Global Culture. London: GBR, Routledge.
Roche, M. (2009). “Mega-events, culture and modernity: Expos and the origins of public culture”. International Journal of Cultural Policy (online), 5 (1). (Accessed 6 May 2012)
Schapiro, Meyer.. (1941). “ Letter to the Editor”. Art Bulletin . Vol.23, No.2,p. 173.
Williford, D. (2015). The Aesthetic Book of Decadent Literature, 1870-1914. UCLA. ProQuest ID: Williford_ucla_0031D_13995. Merritt ID: ark:/13030/m58h1fs3. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/12m8g9f7